|
Dublin Core |
PKP Metadata Items |
Metadata for this Document |
|
1. |
Title |
Title of document |
Effects of Novelty and Its Dimensions on Aesthetic Preference in Product Design |
|
2. |
Creator |
Author's name, affiliation, country |
Wei-Ken Hung; Mingchi University of Technology; |
|
2. |
Creator |
Author's name, affiliation, country |
Lin-Lin Chen; National Taiwan University of Science and Technology; Taiwan |
|
3. |
Subject |
Discipline(s) |
Idustrial Design, Psychology |
|
3. |
Subject |
Keyword(s) |
Product Semantics, Novelty, Aesthetic Preference, Trendiness, Complexity, Emotion |
|
4. |
Description |
Abstract |
Product designers seek to create novel designs that elicit aesthetic responses from consumers. In this paper, we re-visited the much investigated relationship between novelty and aesthetic preference, but also with a new focus on what constitutes novelty in product design. Based on prior research on consumer’s perception of product appearance, we included three fundamental dimensions of product semantics-trendiness, complexity, and emotion-in our study, and investigated their influences on novelty and aesthetic preference. We selected 88 chairs that are highly varied in shape but correspond to a common prototype-a chair with back support and without arms- as stimuli. We then conducted a semantic differential study on the 88 chairs, where trendiness, complexity, and emotion were measured by using bipolar adjectives “traditional-modern”, “simple-complex”, and “rational-emotional”, respectively, while novelty and aesthetic preference were evaluated by using the bipolar adjectives “typical-unique” and “beautiful-ugly”, respectively. The results confirm Berlyne’s hypothesis that the relationship between novelty and aesthetic preference resembles an inverted-U curve, where the chairs perceived to be most beautiful are those with a moderate level of novelty. Each of the three dimensions-trendiness, complexity, and emotion-forms a positive linear relationship with novelty. This result shows that the three fundamental dimensions of product semantic can be regarded as predictor variables for novelty; of the three dimensions, trendiness has the greatest influence, followed by complexity, and finally by emotion. The three dimensions influence aesthetic preference differently: both complexity and emotion exhibit inverted-U relationships with aesthetic preference, while trendiness has a small positive linear relationship with aesthetic preference. |
|
5. |
Publisher |
Organizing agency, location |
Chinese Institute of Design |
|
6. |
Contributor |
Sponsor(s) |
National Science Council, Taiwan |
|
7. |
Date |
(YYYY-MM-DD) |
2012-08-30 |
|
8. |
Type |
Status & genre |
Peer-reviewed Article |
|
8. |
Type |
Type |
|
|
9. |
Format |
File format |
PDF, HTML |
|
10. |
Identifier |
Universal Resource Indicator |
https://www.ijdesign.org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/1146 |
|
11. |
Source |
Journal/conference title; vol., no. (year) |
International Journal of Design; Vol 6, No 2 (2012) |
|
12. |
Language |
English=en |
en |
|
14. |
Coverage |
Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.) |
|
|
15. |
Rights |
Copyright and permissions |
|